New report examines costs to US industrial sector of Obama’s Paris pledge

industrial sector

U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a statement on the Paris climate accord in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, U.S., October 5, 2016. Reuters photo by Yuri Gripas. Industrial sector

Hardest hit sectors would be iron and steel

WASHINGTON, DC – Meeting the commitments President Obama made as part of the Paris climate accord could cost the US economy $3 trillion and 6.5 million industrial sector jobs by 2040, according to a comprehensive new study prepared by NERA Economic Consulting.

The study was commissioned by the American Council for Capital Formation with support from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for 21st Century Energy.

The report, “Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Regulations on the Industrial Sector,” explores several potential scenarios under which the United States could meet the Obama administration’s international emissions pledge as part of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Existing regulations fall well short of achieving former-President Obama’s goal of a 26 per cent to 28 per cent reduction in net emissions from the 2005 level by 2025, and an 80 per cent reduction by 2040.

“This groundbreaking study is the first of its kind to showcase the economic pain and job loss that would result from imposing ever-tightening climate policy regulations on the US industrial sector,” said Margo Thorning, senior economic policy advisor to the American Council for Capital Formation Center for Policy Research.

The study provides the first detailed analysis of the costs and impacts associated with the additional measures that would be needed to close this “gap.”

“What’s more, the regulatory approach is unlikely to succeed in reducing global emissions as our industrial and manufacturing activity will seek a more-friendly regulatory environment, thereby undermining US climate goals,” said Thorning.

“This study does the analysis that the Obama administration should have done in the first place, and it finds that it is next to impossible to meet the Paris pledge gap without major new restrictions on the manufacturing and industrial sectors – restrictions that could reverse the manufacturing renaissance we are currently experiencing, pushing jobs back overseas,” said Karen Harbert, president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber’s Institute for 21st Century Energy.

The report’s central scenario projects that additional regulatory actions necessary to meet the Paris target would by 2025 reduce US GDP by $250 billion, reduce economy-wide employment by 2.7 million jobs, and lower household income by $160.

Industrial sector jobs would fall by 1.1 million, with the cement, iron and steel, and petroleum refining sectors suffering the largest production losses.

Under the study’s core scenario, the industrial 2025 output declines by about 21 per cent, 20 per cent, and 11 per cent, respectively.

Higher energy costs also hurt domestic demand and the international competitiveness of US industry, leading to a greater share of industrial demand being met by imports.

The study also examines the potential longer-term impacts of placing US emissions on a trajectory to achieve the Obama administration’s long-term emissions goal of an 80 percent reduction by 2050.

It found that in 2040, the last year of the model run, GDP would be reduced by nearly $3 trillion, industrial employment would fall by 6.5 million jobs, and average household income would decrease by $7,000.

Another finding is that emissions “leakage” to other countries is a significant factor, and ultimately renders the U.S. regulatory approach ineffective at reducing global carbon emissions.

In 2025, 33 per cent of industrial sector emissions reductions are transferred to other countries as production shifts from the United State to other parts of the world.

The industrial products produced in these plants would then be imported back into the United States. The study includes specific state impacts for four key manufacturing states—Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and Ohio.

In Michigan, state GDP would decline by 0.8 per cent in 2025, household income by $180, and employment by 74,000 jobs — including 13,000 manufacturing and industrial jobs.

The hardest hit sectors would be iron and steel, and refining, with output declining by 14 per cent and 9 per cent, respectively.

In Missouri, state GDP would decline by 1 per cent in 2025, household income by $190, and employment by 53,000 jobs — including 7,000 manufacturing and industrial jobs.

The hardest hit sectors would be iron and steel and cement, with output declining by 20 per cent and 18 per cent, respectively.

north slope

Ph: 432-978-5096 Website: www.mapleleafmarketinginc.com

In Ohio, state GDP would decline by 1.2 percent in 2025, household income by $390, and employment by 110,000 jobs — including 24,000 manufacturing and industrial jobs.

The hardest hit sectors would be cement and iron and steel, with output declining by 16 per cent and 13 per cent, respectively.

And finally, in Pennsylvania, state GDP would decline by 1.8 per cent in 2025, household income by $1,000, and employment by 140,000 jobs — including 26,000 manufacturing and industrial jobs.

The hardest hit sectors would be iron and steel and cement production, with output declining by 16 per cent and 15 per cent, respectively.

Posted in: Energy Politics

Post a Comment