Fracking researchers covered 7,400 square kms over 3 years, taking 64 samples from drinking water wells on residential properties
In the largest study of its kind, a Yale University-led investigation found no evidence fracking is responsible for contamination of drinking water well near the Marcellus Shale in NE Pennsylvania.
The deep hydraulic fracturing of shale horizons, underground storage tanks, well casing failures, or surface waste containment ponds were all ruled out as sources of contamination.
The presence of organic compounds in groundwater aquifers overlying the Marcellus Shale is likely the result of surface releases from hydraulic fracturing operations and not migration from gas wells or deep shale layers, according to researchers in the lab of Desiree L. Plata, assistant professor of chemical and environmental engineering at Yale.
Using a suite of chemical analyses, the researchers found that a subset of the groundwater samples contained low levels of organic compounds in areas close to natural gas wells. The analyses also indicated that these compounds most likely entered the groundwater supply from gas extraction operations above the ground surface — and not subsurface migration.
“These tests showed that there is some separation, both in space and time, of the materials that they’re injecting into the deep horizons and the groundwater sources,” Plata said.
The results of the study were published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Brian Drollette, a Ph.D. student in Plata’s lab, is the lead author.
Due to its vast reserves of natural gas, the Marcellus Shale has become an active site for hydraulic fracturing. During a period of rapid natural gas well expansion, the researchers regularly visited the northeastern region of Pennsylvania, covering about 7,400 square kilometers, over three years and obtained 64 samples from the drinking water wells of residential properties.
“That is because we case these wells in steel and cement. There are multiple layers of steel and cement,” Corky Demarco, executive director of the West Virginia Oil and Natural Gas Association, said in reaction to the study as reported by the Wheeling News-Register.
“We ask everyone with water wells in the vicinity of our operations to allow us to do a baseline test on their well before we start working. Once we are finished, we can go back to look at the baseline sample to determine if there is a problem.”
A compound-specific analysis also revealed the presence of a hydraulic fracturing fluid additive in the affected water samples. Chemicals found in the water did not exceed any state or federal limits, and many were detected only because the researchers were using sophisticated and very sensitive instruments. None of the contaminants were derived from the shale itself.
“The dominant chemicals that we found are industrial-sourced materials and don’t have any known natural sources,” Plata said.
Due to limited data, it’s difficult to compare the rate of these spills to other types of fuel spills, the researchers say.
“In general, there is a risk in any industrial activity associated with accidental failures, and we can’t compare this industry to any other fuel extraction or transport process without knowing the relative volumes of spilled and transported materials,” Plata said.
The researchers said the results are encouraging, since surface violations are known entities and the drinking water sources that have been affected by the surface spills can be targeted for monitoring and treatment.
In both geographic area and quantity of samples, the study is the largest to look at the distribution of organic chemicals related to hydraulic fracturing operations. Plata noted, however, that the study results shouldn’t be used to draw conclusions about the effects of hydraulic fracturing in other regions.
“Subsurface geology is wildly different across the United States,” she said. “While there are shale deposits across the country, the geology above those shale deposits is highly variable, so in some places you might have much different communication between the deep formation fluids and the shallow ground water.”
The study’s other co-authors are Kathrin Hoelzer and Martin Elsner, Helmholtz Zentrum München; Nathaniel R. Warner, Pennsylvania State University; Osman Karatum, Megan P. O’Connor, and Avner Vengosh, Duke University; Thomas H. Darrah, Ohio State University; Robert K. Nelson and Christopher M. Reddy, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; Loretta A. Fernandez, Northeastern University; and Robert B. Jackson, Stanford University.